It’s a Question of Trust


Scandals, scandals, scandals! Get ’em while they’re hot!

The stories are out there. The rapidly rising cost projections for ObamaCare far beyond any promises made to get the bill passed, the Fast and Furious gun running debacle, the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi who died without aid or succor, the IRS targeting of conservative and Tea Party groups, the harassment of journalists at AP and James Rosen of FOX News, and the NSA’s massive overreach in collecting data on anyone who uses a phone, texts a message, e-mails his girlfriend, asks Mom for a recipe, or surfs the web. And those constant reports that the next major piece of legislation, the so-called Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, has had more flips and flops than a hyperactive chef at IHOP. These stories are all out there, and they’re said to have damaged the government by “eroding” the trust of the American people.

In each of these examples, the government of the United States has told lies to the citizens who hired it, collectively, to do a job. The job description that government employees were supposed to adhere to, and fulfill, is most commonly called the Constitution of the United States. And those who have actually read the Constitution are fully aware that the government is allowed to do only certain things — and not a single thing beyond that. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments make perfectly clear that there are defined limits to the authority that we have granted to the government.

Unless my copy of the Constitution has been redacted beyond all measure, lying to us is not one of the powers we granted to our federal government back in 1789. Yet it seems that our government is now (paraphrasing an old advertising line used by General Electric) working on the basis that Lying Is Our Most Important Product.

And yet our esteemed leader, Barack Obama, has had the temerity to actually say:

“If People can’t trust us — to do our jobs — then we are going to have a problem here.”

And to claim that the trust the average citizen had in his government is “eroding” is just another example of the twisting and distortions that the government is constantly trying to peddle. To erode means a slow wearing away of something that was solid, such as water wearing away at our coastlines as waves hit the shore.

The lengthy menu of scandals currently being covered (or ignored, depending on the media outlet) is not really showing anything eroding, unless you want to define a tsunami wiping out your four-year-old’s sand castle in 0.01 seconds as erosion.

The obvious erosion of trust in government began with the rise of the Tea Parties, the strength of Ron Paul’s libertarian message, and the collapse of confidence among both Democrats and Republicans in the members of their own parties in Congress and the Senate. And with each new exposure of corruption, malfeasance, and common garden-variety idiocy, the confidence that Americans have in the people they’ve hired weakens. In fact, a recent Rasmussen poll indicates that only one in ten Americans has any faith at all in Congress. To be fair, though, Democrats express a slightly higher percentage of support for Congress — 12%. Even that is nothing to brag about.

So trust is gone among most voters, even those who drank a lot of Kool-Aid. And once trust is gone, no amount of speeches, promises, grandiose plans for having a debate or a national conversation about the “issues,” or trying to change the subject is going to change the general feeling that is now even obvious to our president — we don’t trust you!

I was lucky enough to have an older gentleman become a sort of mentor to me when I started working, and he made an observation that has stayed with me for the last forty years. He was commenting on the lack of professionalism and the poor performance of a large group of second-tier managers in an organization when he said, “Remember, first-rate people hire first-rate people. Second-rate people hire third-rate people. The guy in charge here is definitely second-rate, even on a good day.” Looking at his selections for staff at all levels, our president will have to do some major shifting of responsibility and accept a lot of resignations to work his way up to that second-rate classification.

The Administration has tried distraction, but honestly, does anyone think that exposing a new scandal is really going to help? The people in the administration have tried to insinuate that they are not really crooks — just poorly organized. So incompetence is now a defense? A defense for the guy who we were told is the smartest person in the room?

Trust, like respect, is never given. Trust can only be earned. Once that trust is betrayed, it takes a whole lot longer to rebuild after betrayal that it took to build it in the first place. When a people don’t trust their government, resistance to government mandates begins to grow. We all know that the government is inefficient, but we used to trust that everyone was paying for that inefficiency equally. When the illusion of equality is pierced, and trust is destroyed, whom do the ordinary people turn to? The answer to that question won’t be the government. Not the government that exists today.

This situation creates a unique opportunity for demagogues to rattle on about how they can cure all our ills if we just “trust” them. Obama himself has tried to sell that idea, and his approval ratings are tanking, but there are always others waiting in the wings.

To the key answer to the question “Whom can we trust?” is a simple, two-word response: no one. Keep that answer in the forefront, and try to convince the rest of your community that blind trust got us into this, but more won’t get us out.

Advertisements

About Jim Yardley

Retired after 30 years as a financial controller for a variety of manufacturing firms, a two-tour Vietnam veteran, and independent voter.
Gallery | This entry was posted in 2014 election, Barack Obama, Benghazi, Constitution, Department of Homeland Security, Elections, Foreign Affairs, Freedom of Speech, Gun Control, IRS, Libya, Limited Government, Mainstream Media, Obamacare, Observing Our Culture, Political Doubletalk, Second Amendment, Taxes, Tea_Parties, Terrorism and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to It’s a Question of Trust

  1. Pete Morin says:

    The very idea of “trusting” government should be anathema to any reasonable, prudent individual. We expect banks, car makers, insurance companies, or any other commercial enterprise to live up to the claims they make when we give them our limited resources. If they disappoint us, or worse, we look elsewhere to give our business.

    The same cannot be said concerning government. Liberal politicians, who actively destroy liberty and people’s rights defined in the Constitution, continue to blithely ignore the people they purportedly represent. Until now, firing any of these power mad fools has been nearly impossible. Hopefully, this may soon change. People can now see with their own eyes the results of “trusting” these despicable liars. The framers knew the importance of carefully monitoring our elected officials. Otherwise, why set up an intricate web of ‘checks & balances’ on governing.

    It is encumbent upon us, the owners of this government, to rid ourselves of these self seeking, would be lords and masters. Not doing so will leave a legacy that our children, and grandchildren, will leave them asking the question–” what own earth were they thinking, that they could actually TRUST these con artists?”

    We get the government we deserve, and trust has nothing to do with it.

  2. Liza Mooney says:

    The same government that shipped guns to criminal gangs in Mexico to demonize the Second Amendment (“Fast & Furious” scandal) is planning to seize ALL of your guns. The U.S. military is actively training now to confiscate all the firearms of law-abiding civilians. 1961 State Department memo reveals detailed plan to disarm ALL Americans. New Orleans police repeatedly rape women in the “free-for-all” after Katrina. This is what martial law looks like, and it is coming to YOUR TOWN! Be Prepared, or Be Prepared to Be Fleeced!

    • Jim Yardley says:

      It would be helpful if you could provide what evidence you base your charges on so the rest of us could evaluate the charges ourselves. If you make charges essentially saying “Trust me, I’m telling the truth”, then you really ought to get a job in the Obama administration.

  3. Aileen Crane says:

    The corporate media is completely oblivious to this hypocrisy. Maloney’s bill is being portrayed as an effort to combat the drug cartels and put an end to the violence in Mexico at the same time congressional hearings reveal the government is responsible for arming them.

  4. is never given. Trust can only be earned. Once that trust is betrayed, it takes a whole lot longer to rebuild after betrayal that it took to build it in the first place. When a people don’t trust their government, resistance to government mandates begins to grow. We all know that the government is inefficient, but we used to trust that everyone was paying for that inefficiency equally. When the illusion of equality is pierced, and trust is destroyed, whom do the ordinary people turn to? The answer to that question won’t be the government. Not the government that exists today.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s