And Just Who are the Racists Again?


If an individual or a group was utterly consumed with concern about a race, and used race as the sole litmus test for evaluating anything, you’d say that such people were racists, wouldn’t you?

If a group was convinced that the only reason anyone could conceivably oppose Obama is the color of his skin, doesn’t that indicate an obsession with race?

If people are willing to ignore violence and bloodshed when one race perpetrates in against another, but only perpetrator of the violence is black, doesn’t that sort of indicates a racial preference that overwhelms rational thought.  That, too, sounds like the behavior and attitudes of a racist, wouldn’t you say?

The unfortunate election of Barack Obama has given the left yet another epithet to toss like a grenade into what they apparently consider “uncivil discourse”.  The phrase “we need to engage in more civil discourse” has, itself, become a leftist favorite to deflect any criticism of the president or any of his policies.  But in addition the Obama presidency has provided the left with an opportunity to accuse any disagreement, on any topic, by not only elected politicians but any citizen of the country with being a racist. 

By accusing ordinary people of racism whenever they are critical of Mr. Obama’s behavior, his policies, his selections for Cabinet positions, or anything else connected with the man, the accusers are essentially claiming that Barack Hussein Obama is so perfect, so flawless, so intelligent, so moral, so ethical, so well informed, so utterly wonderful that the only reason to disagree with anything he does can only be, in fact it must be, attributed to racism.

Yet their very use of the term strips bare the pretense that liberals in general, the media, academia, Progressives and Democrats are themselves without any taint of racism.  The left is absolutely obsessed with the color of a person’s skin.  That sort of obsession must be viewed, by any rational standard, as the very essence of racism. 

Because of the tint of his skin tone, it apparently is not possible to disagree with any of Obama’s policies in any area of governance unless you are prepared to be accused of being a direct philosophical descendant of Nathan Bedford Forrest.

Look at the lengths that the media have gone through to avoid the identification of the race of those young men who have participated in the recent beatings and deaths of random whites.  Other than identifying the accused as being “youths”, little if any information is provided to the media’s viewers or readers.  Of course there is little if any rationale for these senseless beatings.  They do not appear to be revenge.  They do not appear to have any motive other than the fact that they perpetrators are black and the victims are white.  While George Zimmerman is classified as a white-Hispanic (a brand new form of racial identification) who killed a black teen, unless pressed, black on white killings and beating are now considered so normal that the media doesn’t even have to make an effort to hide the race of the perpetrator. 

One can only infer that, since the media themselves are so self-evidently free from bias of any sort, they simply assume that their readers will immediately grasp that, absent any sort of racial identification, they are talking about a black perpetrator.  Among the even more politically-correct, liberal and doctrinaire media, they probably assume that their readers will assume that the racial group that they are not mentioning are not black, but rather African-Americans.

So who exactly is racially obsessed?  The Republican Party was founded to end slavery.  The Democrat Party spent a century trying to maintain de facto, if not de jure, slavery.  A greater proportion of Republicans in Congress voted in favor of the 1964 Civil Rights act than did Democrats.  A Republican, Eisenhower, appointed Earl Warren to the Supreme Court, and the Warren court directed legal decisions toward freedom and opportunity for blacks in this country.

On the other hand, the Democrats provided us with George Wallace, Lester Maddox, Bull Conner and Robert Byrd.

These rather simple examples seemed to have escaped the latest tirade offered up by Florida congressman Alan Grayson when he accused the Tea Party of being the latest incarnation of the Ku Klux Klan.  The fact that Grayson was not immediately castigated by Pelosi, Reid, Wasserman-Schultz or Barack Obama himself indicates that they are in agreement with his comments.

Their agreement with Grayson is not only a display of amazing ignorance, their lack of push-back is not only tacit agreement, but utterly contemptible.

Advertisements

About Jim Yardley

Retired after 30 years as a financial controller for a variety of manufacturing firms, a two-tour Vietnam veteran, and independent voter.
Gallery | This entry was posted in Barack Obama, Democrats, House of Representatives, Mainstream Media, Observing Our Culture, Political Doubletalk, Politics, Racism, Republicans, Senate, Tea_Parties, Terrorism, Violence and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to And Just Who are the Racists Again?

  1. J-M says:

    I love the eighth paragraph… I certainly DO immediately jump to the conclusion that if the race of the perp is omitted, that it is a black commiting the crime. Years ago when I lived in the SF Bay area a truck driver was killed when he accidenlty got lost (easy to do) in SF. The news described the killers as simply “youths” and begged the public to help them solve the crime. There was a real description as there were eye witnesses, but the police decided that it was, oh I don’t know, racist, insensitive, unnacceptable in some way to mention that it was black thugs and give a physical descrition other than the vague “youths”.

    So now, I look harder. Somewhere on line there is a real journalist who simply reports and records the FACTS without any of this nonsense of concealing the perps race, or for that matter, their religious convictions, or their immigration status/country of origin for the sake of not “offending” anybody. Facts are pesky things. They don’t care about pc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s