Why Do “Progressives” Love Moving Backward?


by JIM YARDLEY

The news that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has used real, living human beings for testing that they themselves admit is potentially lethal is being greeted with a collective (and collectivist) shrug by the main stream media.

In fairness, it should be noted that these bipedal guinea pigs were paid $12 an hour to allow the EPA to put their lives at risk. Perhaps the fact that the EPA, doubtless to please their Supreme Leader in the White House, paid them a bit more than Obama’s ideal minimum wage of $10.10 an hour gave them the feeling that they were entitled to gloss over the risks inherent to the lives and health of the test subjects since according to published reports, that’s exactly what happened.

It harkens back to the Nixon years when Tricky Dick announced, during his interview with David Frost, that “If the President does it, it’s not illegal.” It seems when mindless minions of the President act in such a manner as to make Josef Mengele blush, that’s not illegal either.

Progressives, who invariable claim the mantle of being forward looking and seeking only a new Utopia (they’d never say “heaven on earth” since that would allude to religion) for all the people seem to have moved back in time to 1977 when Frost interviewed Nixon. Could they be so ignorant of history that they would using a justification similar to one cited by a president that they themselves regularly defiled (after all, why stop at merely being critical) for committing what, in an earlier time, would have been classed as a “Crime against Humanity”?

Of course it’s possible that these experimenters for the EPA felt utterly safe from rebuke, much less criminal liability, because they were confident that Eric Holder would announce that, after a careful investigation of these experimental methods, there was “…nothing to see here. Move along now.”

Now anyone with a knowledge of (non-revisionist) history can tell you that such experimentation on human beings was not without precedent.

While the aforementioned Dr. Mengele is infamous for the experiments performed on those Jews confined in Hitler’s monstrous Auschwitz concentration camp during World War Two, it should not be overlooked that Nazi ideology felt that those who were used in Mengele’s experiments, as Jews, were not to be viewed as human. They were a lesser species of some sort that needed to be exterminated.

But let us not crown the Nazi’s and Dr. Mengele with undue credit for being at the forefront of such human experimentation. Dr. Mengele began his career at Auschwitz in 1943. But if we go back eleven earlier, the ugly head of indifference to human suffering in the name of “science” rears itself again.

In 1932, the first year of the Roosevelt administration, the Public Health Service (PHS) began what has come to be known as the Tuskegee syphilis experiment. What follows (thanks to Wikipedia) is a thumbnail of what the Tuskegee experiment involved:

The Public Health Service started working with the Tuskegee Institute in 1932. Investigators enrolled in the study a total of 600 impoverished sharecroppers from Macon County, Alabama. 399 of those men had previously contracted syphilis before the study began, and 201did not have the disease. The men were given free medical care, meals, and free burial insurance, for participating in the study. They were never told they had syphilis, nor were they ever treated for it. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the men were told they were being treated for “bad blood”, a local term for various illnesses that include syphilis, anemia, and fatigue.

Sounds eerily similar to what the EPA told their test subjects. Test subjects, not people, not human beings whose lives were being put at risk. Author James Jones, who wrote Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, indicated a similar attitude on the part of the “scientists” involved with the Tuskegee scandal. He states that those he interviewed for his book expressed that “The men’s status did not warrant ethical debate. They were subjects, not patients; clinical material, not sick people.” (Emphasis supplied)

Perhaps Hitler, Eichmann, Mengele and others chose to follow the Tuskegee model of ethical medical conduct. Of course there is always the possibility that great minds were just thinking alike.

There is no rational defense for the actions of the EPA, but they are in keeping with Progressive ideology, which can be summarized as “You can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.” It appears that Progressives have been making human omelets since the Roosevelt administration, and while many Progressives will succumb to the vapors, the Nazis took a Progressive view of the superiority of one group over another, and have done so once again under Barack Obama.

And all this time I thought they were supposed to be looking forward toward a new utopia. Silly me.

Advertisements

About Jim Yardley

Retired after 30 years as a financial controller for a variety of manufacturing firms, a two-tour Vietnam veteran, and independent voter.
Gallery | This entry was posted in Abortion, Barack Obama, Climate Change / Global Warming, Environment, Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Radicals, EPA, Government Spending, Healthcare, Observing Our Culture, Political Doubletalk and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Why Do “Progressives” Love Moving Backward?

  1. kathy says:

    Column so good that I read it here and at American Thinker.
    The left wants power to make the rest of us powerless. I am waiting for the second American Revolution.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s